Shocking to the reliably stupid American left is North Korea's threats of nuclear war if the United Nations enforces a blockade on the export of North Korean missile technology to Iran and Syria, the export of which violates Nobel Prize-winning agreements with freelance diplomat Jimmy Carter not to do so in exchange for $4 Billion from the Clinton administration to build the nuclear reactors that armed North Korea with nuclear weapons in the first place.
As early as 1998, four years after the agreement with North Korea, the Senate Foreign Relations committee considered cutting off the $4 Billion nuclear reactor deal with North Korea because of blatant violations of the Agreed Nuclear Framework. Over Republican objections, Democrats in support of President Clinton pushed through a bill to continue funding North Korea's nuclear program despite the violations of that agreement. Moron watchers may recall our Vice-President Joe Biden in 2002, when he was still a Senator and senior member of the Foreign Relations committee, fiercely criticizing President Bush's inclusion of North Korea in his "Axis of Evil" speech, stating an unfamiliarity with any violations by North Korea.
As frightening as it is to contemplate that the Democratic Party's "foreign policy expert" Joe Biden can't recall important foreign policy discussions that transpired under his Commitee's guidance a mere four years before lipping off in defense of North Korea's Stalinist regime in 2002, it's more frightening that Biden is now a institutional voice that guides the development of foreign policy within the Obama administration.
In October 2000, Secretary of State Madeline Albright went to North Korea to ask them pretty please to stop exporting missile technologies to state sponsors of terrorism, and personally presented Dear Leader Kim Jong-il with a hand-autographed Michael Jordan NBA basketball to show that the United States wanted to be taken seriously.
It's too late to stop North Korea from acquiring President Clinton's $4 Billion nuclear weapons business starter kit with Joe Biden's help. But before North Korean nuclear weapons begin killing people, can we get that basketball back?
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Can we get the ball back?
Uploaded by
beamish
at
6/14/2009 08:38:00 AM





16 error messages:
Who's Michael Jordan, anyways?
FJ,
He sells underwear, I think.
Use B1 bombers with suitable escorts...heck, a B-52 might cause kimmie to hand back the basketball. Of course he might have to change his Michael Jordan underwear afterwards...
tmw
BTW-I'm a
Faith-Based Fighter
You are a Faith-Based Fighter, also known as a religious conservative. You believe in Judeo-Christian values, restoring God’s rightful place in the public square, and in showing all the unwashed and unsaved liberal sinners the path to salvation, or at least to the libertarian party.
TMW,
If I were President (and it's America's fault I'm not) I would reject any war plan for North Korea that didn't guarantee at least a 60% North Korean civilian casualty rate.
I picked up that new doo-dad over at LA Sunsett's blog. It scored me accurately, so I pinned it up. "Anti-government gunslinger" is me.
//It scored me accurately, so I pinned it up. "Anti-government gunslinger" is me.//
Yippee-ti-yi-yay.
Yippee-ti-yi-yay.
Bleeeh. I'm more of a manly "hell yeah!" or "yee=haw" than than that.
You think I'm from Texas or something?
Yippee=ti-yi-yay is something I picture Lloyd Bentsen saying...
Mr. B.-My son DID vote for you, so there is some hope for some of our young people!
G*D bless ad MARANATHA!
tmw
I did go with 1 libertarian answer though...;-}
We can't get the ball back under the BHO administration.
Get ready for every Third World country to have nukes. It's coming.
I just shortened Yippee-ti-yi-yay from what I remember from the end of the classic Zappa tune, Montana. I think old Frank's line was yippee -yi-yo-ti yay.
Anyway, now that we know you are a "hell yeah" and "yee-haw" guy, it begs another question:
What are your thoughts on "yer damn straight"?
LA Sunsett,
It beats "yer darn tootin."
One interesting way to solve the DPRK issue: stop reporting on them, and also halt feeding them.
No food means no work, and no work means no nuclear technology.
Starvation is the best weapon in this case.
This, by the way, is a policy that the US of A needs to adopt:
Stop feeding the world, and stop all foreign aid.
Feeding the world is appeasement; the idea of feeding the world so that other countries will favor us is dead. It doesn't work. It only creates and brings birth to more enemies.
Steve,
North Korea doesn't have nukes because we fed them. We don't send food to North Korea, at least not directly.
North Korea has nukes because Democrats in the Clinton years bought them a nuclear program.
A nuclear program they built on the backs of starving North Koreans.
The average Nork IS starving, their 'fearless leaders' sure as hell aren't.
Post a Comment